I decided for assignment four to join efforts with a friend. We discussed the nature of the topic and agreed to cover the relationship between art and the Internet. With this knowledge, I contrived a vague concept proposal that I believe to be well written and would hopefully sway our lecturer into accepting our proposal, while allowing us more time to think through our design. It didn’t!
The response was quick as it was devastating. This led to an acknowledgment that we needed to create a carefully constructed view of our podcast, so we met at 9:00 am on Saturday in the library and we spent a long day working on six different sections. We walked away pleased with our efforts and I believed that creating a new concept proposal from our semi-detailed notes would be simple.
After the first hour and half of sitting in front of a screen full of text, none of which was useful, I felt like screaming. Then I shuck off the fear and frustration, made a cup of tea while I considered the faults of the first proposal and constructive criticism offered by our lecturer. I soon realised that it needed to discuss the content in a factual manner, so I imagined how the finished project might look then wrote a description of my vision. This produced an acceptable concept proposal and the short-lived but deserved high, gave way to the practical matters of how to complete the assignment in the given time.
There was only one answer and I invited my colleague to stay for the weekend. Saturday arrived and we sat at the kitchen table with all kinds of recording equipment. Then we carefully discarded each piece as it either did not work, produce a terrible sound or crashed the computer. We finally ended up with the internal microphone of a Mac. We spent the rest of the afternoon feeling foolish, frustrated and rather annoyed at our poor performances, but we had completed all sections of the podcast.
We woke the next day eager to fix the problems and finish the podcast. We soon learned the only way to overcome our mistakes was to careful write down a script for each section. The day passed quickly as our progress moved at a snail’s pace. We finished towards the end of the afternoon feeling rather happy at completing that fragment and relieved that the efforts of constantly trying to be creative had passed.
To find suitable visuals we agreed to duplicate this task, then meet the following weekend and take the best from each podcast and create a publishable attempt. However things did not go to plan, I completed an eight minute plus podcast with visuals all taken from either ‘General Public Licence’ or ‘Creative Common’ sources. Only to be told, by way of my friend’s grapevine, that anything over six minutes would result in a zero mark.
Time for a back up plan, my comrade decided that my visuals were wonderful and he would strip and chop at the audio until it was six minutes long. We met later to finish off the assignment by adjusting my visuals to match the new time scale, create an mp4 from our exported WMA file. Each believing the other knew how to do that! After some frantic searching and a number of near misses we created an mp4 file, which we uploaded to my webspace and with the creation of a RSS txt file we had created our first podcast.
The podcast can be seen at:
http://savethebush.comli.com/podcast.rss